Opened 6 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#112 closed defect (fixed)

repl redefinitions

Reported by: alexshinn Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:
Cc:

Description

R5RS leaves unspecified the semantics of
redefining a standard binding in the REPL.
Do we want to specify semantics, or some
set of allowed behavior for this in the WG1
standard?

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from new to decided

We voted for the most common behavior among implementations -
override, except preserve for non-syntax to syntax.

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from decided to writing

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from writing to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.