Duplicate identifiers in define-record-type
|Reported by:||arcfide||Owned by:||alexshinn|
|Component:||WG1 - Core||Keywords:|
Description (last modified by arcfide)
What happens if define-record-type is specified with two fields that have the same accessor identifiers provided for both fields? More generally, we need to say what happens when any two identifiers are non-unique.
This ticket deals specifically with the situation where two identifiers (accessors or mutators) of two field clauses in a define-record-type form are identical. This is not meant to address field names and what happens or what it means if the field names are symbolically equivalent but lexically distinct.