Opened 6 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#188 closed defect (fixed)

Clarify wording of `and` and `or` definitions

Reported by: arcfide Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:


The definitions of and and or may be slightly confusing. Reword them to be more clear. One possible hiccup is that the current language permits the return of different false values, while a clearer wording may preclude this.

R6RS provides a clearer definition that does not provide wiggle room for multiple false values. Should we use that?

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by arcfide

I prefer the R6RS wording.

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by cowan

I've already provided new wording. Please slow down and see what I've been doing.

comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from new to decided

We voted for the R6RS wording.

comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from decided to writing

comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from writing to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.