Ticket #2 (writing enhancement)
module system
| Reported by: | alexshinn | Owned by: | alexshinn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | |
| Component: | WG1 - Modules | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | arcfide@… |
Description
As per the charter, we need a module system
proposal which allows sharing of code between
implementations.
This is one issue where we can't default to
the R5RS, since it has no module system. If
we can't come to consensus, we will have to
take the R6RS module system as-is.
Change History
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by alexshinn
- Type changed from defect to enhancement
- Component changed from WG1 - Core to WG1 - Modules
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by arcfide
- Cc arcfide@… added
I have made a proposal regarding the module system on ModulesAndPackagesArcfide that has been updated recently.
comment:3 Changed 18 months ago by alexshinn
- Status changed from new to closed
- Resolution set to fixed
ModulesShinn won.
comment:4 Changed 16 months ago by alexshinn
- Status changed from closed to reopened
- Resolution fixed deleted
comment:8 Changed 15 months ago by alexshinn
Need to update \subsection{Primitive, library, and optional features}
and \subsection{Entry format} in struct.tex regarding library and optional
features.
Need to update prog.tex to include module system description.
Need to update "Programs and definitions" section of syn.tex to include
modules.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
