Opened 8 years ago

Closed 7 years ago

#34 closed defect (wontfix)

multiple values

Reported by: alexshinn Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:
Cc:

Description

New to R5RS, do we reaffirm multiple values?

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by kumoyuki

No. There is a better way.

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by arcfide

Yes. In the absence of an alternative proposal that is as effectual as multiple values, I would argue for their continued existence.

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

I favor putting them in an optional module (which exports VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES), so that Thing One implementations do not *have* to support them, but if they do, will support them in a standard way.

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

I also support adding LET-VALUES and LET*-VALUES from SRFI 11, which make multiple values easier to use.

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

The WG voted to reaffirm multiple values as part of the core.

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from reopened to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.