Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#393 closed defect (wontfix)

Defining record equality

Reported by: cowan Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Currently, R7RS-small says that when equal? is applied to records that are not eqv? (that were constructed by different calls to the record constructor), the result may be #t or #f at the implementation's discretion. I propose to treat records of the same type like pairs, strings, vectors, and bytevectors: that is, their contents are recursively compared.

Change History (2)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Status changed from new to decided

WG1 voted to leave eqv? on records unspecified.

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from decided to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.