Procedure equivalence should return.
|Reported by:||cowan||Owned by:||alexshinn|
|Component:||WG1 - Core||Keywords:|
Description (last modified by cowan)
The draft semantics of eq? and eqv? as applied to procedures should return to the IEEE/R5RS rules, as distinct from the R6RS rule that procedure equivalence is completely implementation-dependent.
WG1 has already unanimously agreed with this statement.
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by cowan
- Description modified (diff)
- Summary changed from The draft semantics of `eq?` and `eqv?` as applied to procedures should return to the IEEE/R5RS rules to Procedure equivalence should return.