Opened 7 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#69 closed defect (fixed)

SRFI 39 parameters

Reported by: cowan Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:
Cc:

Description

Should we adopt SRFI 39 parameters? How about a subset of SRFI 39 in which parameters are immutable but bindable?

Change History (10)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

The WG voted to accept ImmutableParametersCowan.

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to wontfix
  • Status changed from reopened to closed

WG1 decided to accept ImmutableParametersCowan.

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution wontfix deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner alexshinn deleted
  • Status changed from reopened to assigned

comment:8 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from assigned to decided

comment:9 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner set to alexshinn
  • Status changed from decided to writing

comment:10 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from writing to closed

WG1 decided to adopt parameters with binding, but left mutation undefined.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.