Opened 7 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#8 closed defect (fixed)

SRFI-46 ellipse specifier in syntax-rules

Reported by: alexshinn Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Macros Keywords:
Cc:

Description

As an alternative to #7, SRFI-46 proposed
allowing an optional ellipse specified as
an identifier before the literals list in
syntax-rules:

(syntax-rules ::: ()

<ellipse now represented as ::: instead of ...>)

Do we allow this, and if so how does it interact
with the escapes from #7?

Change History (8)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

The WG voted to accept this feature.

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

To be revoted because there was no simple majority.

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed

Added.

comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner alexshinn deleted
  • Status changed from reopened to assigned

comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from assigned to decided

comment:7 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner set to alexshinn
  • Status changed from decided to writing

comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from writing to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.