Opened 7 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#82 closed defect (fixed)

missing port? procedure

Reported by: cowan Owned by: alexshinn
Priority: major Milestone:
Component: WG1 - Core Keywords:
Cc:

Description

It's not clear whether R5RS requires a PORT? procedure or not. It's listed in Section 3.3.2 under Disjointness of Types, but not under section 6.6.1 under Ports. R6RS requires it. Racket, Gauche, MIT Scheme, Gambit, Chicken, Guile, SISC support it; Scheme48/scsh, Kawa, and Chibi currently do not.

Shall we require it?

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

WG1 voted to accept port?.

comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner alexshinn deleted
  • Status changed from reopened to assigned

comment:4 Changed 7 years ago by alexshinn

  • Status changed from assigned to decided

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by alexshinn

  • Owner set to alexshinn
  • Status changed from decided to writing

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by cowan

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from writing to closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.