wiki:NaturalRecordConstructorDownsides
Last modified 2 years ago Last modified on 03/13/2010 06:10:49 AM

From SRFI-57

The traditional practice of instantiating record values with a positional constructor procedure can lead to code that is hard to read and fragile under common operations such as adding, removing, or rearranging field declarations.


From: "Michael R. Blair"

Reference

I am concerned that the current proposal makes it difficult for me to treat the order of slot-names in a record as irrelevant. About record constructor: What I want is a construction procedure wherein (arg) order is considered irrelevent.